Here is the article: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/01/30/science/fda-limits-red-dye-no-3.html
Here is another example: All uses of Red No. 3 in cosmetics are being banned
Link: http://articles.latimes.com/1990-01-29/business/fi-917_1_fda-bans
This was banned from use in cosmetics and externally applied drugs after the FDA found it caused thyroid cancer in rats and other studies concluded it interferes with nerve impulses in the brain. I want to remind you from my last article about food coloring, that the MATERIAL DATA SAFETY SHEET showed that propylene glycol caused nerve damage.
Now take a look at this page, scroll down to the ingredients, they are still putting Red Dye No 3. in food coloring.
WATER, PROPYLENE GLYCOL, FD&C REDS 40 AND 3, AND 0.1% PROPYLPARABEN (PRESERVATIVE).
http://www.mccormick.com/Products/Extracts-and-Food-Colors/Food-Col...
Artificial colors are a toxic ingredient for all of us. It bothers me more than I can say that the New York times article said "The actual risk posed by Red No. 3 is extremely small. So it is OK to eat a food that is toxic because the actual risk is extremely small? WRONG WRONG WRONG
I can only hope that we can change this for ourselves, our children and the planet. In SEVEN GENERATIONS I would love to see a healthly human race and a healthy earth. Remember these ingredients pollute our water and air and belong in the hazardous waste dump
"You have the right to eat. You have the right to eat wholesome foods. You have the right to read about the foods you are about to eat" --John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton, Toxic Sludge Is Good For You! (Commobn Courage Press, 1995)
Peace To All,
Sue